Google spam update:what can your numbersreally tell you?
Google has been rolling out worldwide since 24 September. Which movements mean something, which are pure noise, and how to check the copy on your pages.
Get in touch- What exactly is Google rolling out?
- How does a spam update differ from a core update?
- Which numbers mean something during a rollout?
- What can you safely ignore right now?
- Is it really the update, or something else?
- Which spam policies actually affect business websites?
- How do you check AI-written page copy?
- How long does recovery take, and where does the picture end?
- Frequently asked questions
- How to handle the coming days
- Where the information on this page comes from

Let's talk about your project.
First we check whether the project fits your business model. Then you get a proposal with phases and effort.
Get your visibility checked or call: +49 151 1576 5566Google started a spam update on 24 September 2026. It applies globally and to all languages, and by Google's own account the rollout may take up to two weeks. For your website that means one thing first of all: numbers from these days are not a basis for decisions. Google itself advises waiting at least a full week after a rollout completes, then comparing the week after with the week before. Rewriting pages now because visibility is moving may well mean repairing something that was never broken. Other work is worth doing in the meantime: check the manual actions report, look at your figures over a long period, and hold machine-written page copy against the spam policies.
- The rollout started on 24 September 2026, applies globally and to all languages, and may take up to two weeks.
- Google recommends waiting at least a full week after completion, then comparing week against week.
- Small shifts in position can happen at any time, and Google advises against radical changes to pages that already perform.
- AI-written copy is not a violation in itself. It becomes one when many pages are produced without value for readers.
On this page
- What exactly is Google rolling out?
- How does a spam update differ from a core update?
- Which numbers mean something during a rollout?
- What can you safely ignore right now?
- Is it really the update, or something else?
- Which spam policies actually affect business websites?
- How do you check AI-written page copy?
- How long does recovery take, and where does the picture end?
- Frequently asked questions
- How to handle the coming days
- Where the information on this page comes from
What exactly is Google rolling out?
Google logged the update in its own Search Status Dashboard on 24 September 2026, where every confirmed ranking update is listed with a start date and a duration. The description is brief: the update applies globally and to all languages, and the rollout may take up to two weeks to complete. Google has said nothing beyond that, neither which policies are in focus nor what share of queries changes.
The announced duration is the notable part. The three earlier spam updates this year finished far faster, the quickest of them in March after less than a day. Two weeks is not a routine figure but the longest window announced this year. In practice that means the phase in which your numbers may move without your website having anything to do with it lasts longer than usual.
A spam update itself is nothing unusual. Google refines its systems continuously, and fighting manipulated search results is day to day business. The attention these dates attract in trade media is often out of proportion to what happens on an ordinary business website.
| Update | Start | Duration per Google |
|---|---|---|
| March spam update | 24 March 2026 | 19 hours 30 minutes |
| June spam update | 24 June 2026 | 2 days 1 hour |
| August spam update | 18 August 2026 | 2 days 16 hours |
| September spam update | 24 September 2026 | announced as up to two weeks |
is the window Google announced for this rollout. The three earlier spam updates of the year each completed within three days.
How does a spam update differ from a core update?
The distinction matters because it decides whether you can be affected at all. A core update, in Google's own words, is broad in nature and does not target specific sites. It changes how Google's systems assess content in general, and it can therefore move pages where nobody did anything wrong.
A spam update works differently. It targets practices Google names explicitly in its spam policies, such as mass produced pages without value, hacked content or bought links. If none of these practices exist on your website, a direct hit is unlikely. Movement in your numbers can still appear, namely when the field around you shifts and other pages rise or fall in the results.
That second effect is regularly overlooked. It explains why a website can gain positions without anyone having worked on it. Anyone measuring visibility should therefore separate their own performance from movement in the surrounding field. More on how visibility can be measured at all is in our article on measuring AI visibility.
Which numbers mean something during a rollout?
The most reliable answer during an active rollout does not come from the click curve but from the manual actions report in Google Search Console. It shows whether a person at Google has demoted your site, or part of it, for a policy violation. If nothing applies, the report displays a green check mark. That is a clear yes or no with no room for interpretation, and it takes two minutes to check.
The second figure that holds up is the long view. For diagnosing drops, Google explicitly recommends setting the performance report to the last sixteen months. That shows whether a decline happens at the same time every year, through holidays or a seasonal business. A dip that looked identical a year ago has nothing to do with the update. Search Console also offers a direct comparison of the last three months year over year.
The third reliable measure is the average position of individual important pages, but only once the rollout has finished. Google advises waiting at least a full week after completion and then comparing the week after with the week before. Anything you see before that is an interim state from a process still in motion.
| Check | When it helps | What it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Manual actions report | Immediately | Has a person at Google demoted your site? |
| Performance report over sixteen months | Immediately | Did the same drop already happen last year? |
| Year over year comparison | Immediately | Is the site moving against its own trend? |
| Position of key pages, week against week | A week after completion | Has the assessment shifted for good? |
| Technical check on availability and indexing | Immediately | Is an update involved at all? |
What can you safely ignore right now?
First of all, small shifts in position. Google writes that minor fluctuations can happen at any time, and explicitly advises against making radical changes to a page that is already performing well. Moving from position two to position four is not a finding, it is normal operation.
The most recent days in the performance report carry little weight either. Google notes that the newest data can be preliminary, because it is still being collected and may change within the next few hours. Reading yesterday's figure in the morning and deriving a trend from it means measuring an incomplete set in part.
The third candidate is visibility indices from third party tools when read without a reference point. Such values rise and fall even when only the composition of the measured keyword set shifts. They are a hint that something is moving, not evidence that your website has got worse. Finally, reports of dramatic drops in trade forums say nothing about your domain. Google has named neither targets nor an affected share of queries for this update.
after a rollout completes is the minimum Google recommends waiting before assessing the effects.
Is it really the update, or something else?
In its guide to search traffic drops, Google names five groups of causes, and an algorithmic update is only one of them. The other four are technical issues, security issues, manual actions, and seasonality with changing user interest. Our own analyses match that picture: when a website suddenly loses visitors, a technical fault is a more frequent cause than a reassessment by Google.
Technical causes are quick to rule out and should therefore be checked first. Is the server reachable throughout? Does robots.txt accidentally block areas that should be indexed? Is a noindex sitting somewhere it does not belong? A single misplaced directive in a template can remove hundreds of pages from the index, and in the curve that looks exactly like a penalty.
The shape of the decline is telling as well. A drop that hits all page types at once points to a technical issue or to something affecting the whole domain. If only certain groups of pages lose while the rest stays stable, that suggests a changed assessment of those specific contents. Which levers actually work then is covered in our article on AI SEO.
| Cause | Typical picture | First check |
|---|---|---|
| Technical issue | Sudden drop across all page types | Availability, robots.txt and indexing |
| Security issue | Warning screens before the page loads | Security issues report in Search Console |
| Manual action | Affected section largely disappears | Manual actions report |
| Algorithmic update | Shift within specific page groups | Match the date against the status dashboard |
| Seasonality | Same pattern as the year before | Set the period to sixteen months |
Which spam policies actually affect business websites?
Most of the policies Google lists describe practices that do not occur on an ordinary company site, such as sneaky redirects or malware. Three points are nonetheless relevant for business websites, and usually without any bad intent behind them.
The first is scaled content abuse. Google describes it as generating many pages whose primary purpose is manipulating rankings and which offer readers little or nothing. The examples name the use of generative AI tools to produce many pages without adding value for users. In practice this covers templated location pages, automatically generated combinations of service and town, or imported manufacturer copy across hundreds of product pages.
The second point concerns third party content on your own domain. Google's site reputation policy only applies where such content is published mainly because the host site already ranks well. Google names counter examples explicitly: wire services and press release sites, syndicated news, forums and comment sections, and columns and opinion pieces. A guest article on your own blog is therefore not a problem in itself. For searchers in the European Economic Area, Google also changed enforcement at the end of August 2026: a manual action under this policy does not take effect there, and the affected section may instead be separated in Google's systems so that it ranks independently from the rest of the site over time.
The third point is user generated spam. Google notes that site owners are often unaware of it. This means flooded comment sections, forums and open upload areas. Anyone running a blog with open comments and rarely looking at them has the most likely finding here.
- 01
Scaled content abuse
Often unintentionalMass produced pages with no value of their own, such as templated location pages or imported manufacturer copy.
- 02
Site reputation abuse
Rare and often misreadApplies only where third party content sits there mainly for the host's ranking signals. Guest posts and comments are excluded.
- 03
User generated spam
Most likely findingFlooded comments, forums and upload areas. Owners rarely notice it on their own.
How do you check AI-written page copy?
The reassurance first, because this point is regularly misrepresented. Google does not ban AI-written content. Its own guidance states that appropriate use of AI or automation is not against the guidelines. It becomes a violation when content is produced with the primary purpose of manipulating rankings. Google is just as clear that AI content earns no bonus: using AI gives content no special gains, it is simply content that has to be useful like any other.
For checking your own pages, that leaves a single decisive question, and it is not which tool wrote the text. It is whether a reader finds something on that page they cannot get elsewhere. Google suggests three guiding questions: who created the content, how was it created, and why does it exist. A text that allows an honest answer to all three is on safe ground regardless of the tool.
In client projects we check three things specifically. First the volume: were many similar pages created in a short time, differing only in a few words? Second the substance: does the page contain anything drawn from your own experience, your own figures or your own cases? Third the evidence: are numbers, dates and claims backed by sources, and do they still hold? These are exactly the points Google describes under experience and trustworthiness, covered in our article on E-E-A-T.
On disclosure Google is cautious but clear: notes about AI or automation are useful where someone might wonder how a piece was created. Listing an AI as the author of a piece, on the other hand, is not something Google considers the right approach. Anyone working in Europe should treat this question separately anyway, because separate transparency obligations apply there, which we cover under AI disclosure obligations.
How long does recovery take, and where does the picture end?
Google gives no fixed timeline. Its documentation says improvements to a site can take effect within a few days but may equally take several months, or land with a later update. Anyone tidying up after a drop should therefore not expect to see the result in the following week. Where a manual action was issued and you have fixed the cause, Google states that a reconsideration review takes several days or weeks, and longer for link related requests.
The bigger limit is what is actually known. Google has named no targets for this update, no affected industries and no share of queries. Any claim about what this update supposedly goes after is therefore a guess, however confidently trade media phrase it. The period is documented and the policies are documented. Nothing beyond that.
The third limit is more fundamental. Search has long ceased to be the only route by which people find suppliers. Anyone watching only Google positions misses what AI systems say about their company. How to measure that is covered under measuring AI visibility, and how AI systems reach your content at all under AI crawlers and robots.txt. If your team is to run these checks itself, our AI training covers how.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a new Google spam update?
Yes. Google started a spam update on 24 September 2026. It applies globally and to all languages, and by Google's account the rollout may take up to two weeks. It is the fourth confirmed spam update of the year.
How do I know whether my site is affected?
Check the manual actions report in Google Search Console first. A green check mark means no human issued action applies. For algorithmic effects, wait a week after the rollout completes and compare the week after with the week before.
What is the difference between a spam update and a core update?
A core update is broad in nature and does not target specific sites; it changes how content is assessed in general. A spam update targets the practices Google names in its spam policies, such as mass produced pages without value.
Is AI-written content on my site a risk?
Not in itself. Google states that appropriate use of AI does not go against its guidelines. A violation occurs when content is produced mainly to manipulate rankings, for example as many pages without value for readers.
How long does it take for a site to recover?
Google names no fixed period. Its documentation says changes can take effect within days but may take several months. After a manual action has been resolved, a reconsideration review takes several days or weeks.
Should I change my website during the rollout?
For small fluctuations Google explicitly advises against radical changes to pages that already perform. What makes sense during this window is checking rather than rebuilding: manual actions, technical health, indexing and your long term figures.
Do guest articles on my site count as a violation?
Only in a narrow case. The site reputation policy applies where third party content sits on a host site mainly because that host already ranks well. Forums, comment sections, columns and opinion pieces are named by Google as counter examples.
How to handle the coming days
- 01
Check manual actions
Open the manual actions report in Google Search Console. The answer is unambiguous and takes two minutes.
- 02
Rule out technical causes
Check availability, robots.txt and indexing before attributing a drop to the update. Technical faults look identical in the curve.
- 03
Look at the long view
Set the performance report to sixteen months and compare year over year. A recurring pattern is seasonality, not an update.
- 04
Assess only after completion
Wait at least a week after the rollout ends, then compare week against week. Before that you only have interim states.
Most websites need patience and a short look at the right reports after a spam update, not a rescue. Rebuilding during the rollout mistakes noise for a finding.
LLM costsLLM Cost Optimization: When a Model Switch Pays Off
Detect AI-written textDetect AI-written text: what AI detectors get wrong
AI agentsAgentic AI Explained: What It Means for Your Business
Google AI ModeGoogle AI Mode: What It Means for Your Website
AI agentsWhat Is an AI Agent, and How Is It Different From a Chatbot?
Structured DataStructured Data: What It Really Does for AI Search
AI AssistantAI Assistant for Business: Types, Uses and Data Protection
GEOE-E-A-T: Trust Signals for Google and AI Search
Local AILocal AI for Business: What “Local” Really Means
GEOAI Crawlers in robots.txt: Managing GPTBot and Co.
AI for SMEsAI for SMEs: How to Introduce AI Step by Step
Perplexity SEOPerplexity SEO: How to Get Your Site Cited as a Source
ChatGPT SEOChatGPT SEO: How to Get Your Business Found in ChatGPT
llms.txtllms.txt: What the File Does and When It Pays Off
AI SEOAI SEO: What Changes Compared to Traditional SEO
AI OverviewsGoogle AI Overviews: How Google Picks Its Sources
GEO vs AEO vs LLMOGEO vs AEO vs LLMO: The AI Search Terms Explained
Measure AI VisibilityMeasure AI Visibility: Method, Metrics and Limits
ChatGPT AdsChatGPT Ads: How to Advertise on ChatGPT in Germany
AI Literacy ObligationAI Literacy Obligation: What Article 4 Requires Since 2026
AI DisclosureAI Chatbot Disclosure: Article 50 in Practice
AI Text WatermarkAI Text Watermark: What Claude Marks and What It Doesn't
ShopwareShopware Plugin Development: Buy or Build? A Guide
Where the information on this page comes from
- Google Search Status Dashboard: Ranking Updatesaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Search Engine Journal: Google Rolls Out September 2026 Spam Update Globallyaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Search Engine Roundtable: Google September 2026 Spam Update Is Rolling Outaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Google Search Central: Spam policies for Google web searchaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Google Search Central: Google Search's core updatesaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Google Search Central: Debugging drops in Google Search trafficaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Google Search Central: Google Search's guidance about AI-generated contentaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Google Search Central: Update to the site reputation policyaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Google Search Console Help: Manual Actions reportaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Google Search Console Help: Performance reportaccessed 26 Sep 2026
- Google Search Central: Creating helpful, reliable, people-first contentaccessed 26 Sep 2026


