AI governance:traceablefrom day one
We build AI systems so that you can later prove what they did, who approved it and on what basis.
Discuss AI governance
Let's talk about your project.
First we check whether the project fits your business model. Then you get a proposal with phases and effort.
Discuss AI governance or call: +49 151 1576 5566AI governance covers the rules, roles and technical safeguards a company uses to steer how it applies AI, and to prove that it does so responsibly. It includes logs that record what an AI system did, clear approvals by people, and staff with documented AI training. Scalableloops builds this auditability directly into the AI systems we develop instead of bolting it on afterwards. This matters most where traceability is not optional: in defence, healthcare and public administration.
- AI governance makes the use of AI in a company visible and provable.
- Since 2 February 2025, Art. 4 of the EU AI Act requires providers and deployers to take measures on their staff's AI literacy.
- For high-risk systems, the AI Act requires automatic logs, to be kept for at least six months.
- We plan logging and human approval into every system from the start.
What does AI governance mean for a company?
Governance for artificial intelligence connects policies, accountability and processes with technology. It answers three questions: Where do we use AI? Who is responsible for what? And how can we show afterwards what happened? The first two are organisational, the third is technical. It can only be answered if the AI system itself records which inputs it received, which outputs it produced and who approved them.
For us, auditability is therefore not a documentation task at the end of a project but a property of the architecture. A system that does not log cannot be audited later, however well the policy is written. That is why controlling AI belongs in the same architecture as data protection and information security, not in a separate compliance document.
Which EU AI Act obligations concern logs and evidence?
The EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, applies in stages and sets requirements according to risk. Some obligations apply to every company that uses AI, others only to high-risk systems. The overview lists the provisions that matter most for logging and evidence.
| Provision | Content | Applies to |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 4 AI literacy | providers and deployers take measures to support their staff's AI literacy, since 2 February 2025 (as amended by the AI Omnibus) | everyone using AI |
| Art. 50 transparency | people are informed they are interacting with an AI; AI-generated content is marked | chatbots, voice agents, generated content |
| Art. 12 record-keeping | high-risk systems must technically allow automatic logging of events over their lifetime | providers of high-risk systems |
| Art. 19 and Art. 26(6) | keep automatically generated logs for at least six months unless other law applies | providers and deployers of high-risk systems |
Whether your system counts as high-risk and from when each obligation applies depends on its intended purpose and is assessed case by case. For the general obligations, see AI literacy under Article 4 and AI disclosure under Article 50.
How do we build auditability into AI systems?
Every system we develop records what it processed and what it output, in a form that can be analysed later. Results with external effect only go out after human approval, and the approval itself is part of the log.
At Defence:Connect we deliver AI pipelines for audit, logging and governance requirements, because companies in the defence sector must bring traceability as a precondition. At JourF’x, conversations become audit-proof documentation. And our own AI agent system follows the same principle: it prepares, your team approves.
Why is training part of governance?
Rules only work if the people working with AI know them. Art. 4 of the EU AI Act obliges companies to take measures for this. In our AI training for companies, your team learns the AI systems in its own daily work and receives a record for each person.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between AI governance and AI compliance?
AI compliance means meeting specific requirements, for example from the EU AI Act and the GDPR. AI governance is the framework around it: roles, rules, approvals and logs with which a company steers and evidences its use of AI.
Does every AI system have to keep logs?
Automatic logging under Art. 12 of the EU AI Act is mandatory for high-risk systems. We recommend it beyond that, because it is the only way to find errors and prove results to customers or auditors.
How long must AI logs be kept?
For high-risk systems, Art. 19 and Art. 26(6) of the EU AI Act require at least six months, unless other law, in particular data protection law, provides otherwise.
Does the AI literacy obligation apply to small companies?
Art. 4 of the EU AI Act addresses providers and deployers of AI systems regardless of size. Which measures fit depends on how your team uses AI.
Can you make existing AI systems auditable afterwards?
Often yes, with limitations. We look at what the system records today and add logs and approvals where technically possible.
How we make your AI traceable
- 01
Inventory
Which AI systems do you use, for what, and who is responsible?
- 02
Assessment
Together we check which obligations apply to your use.
- 03
Implementation
Logs, approvals and labelling are built into the system, not just written on paper.
- 04
Training
Your team learns the rules in its own daily work and receives a record.
Could you prove today what your AI did last month and who approved it? If not, that is the first step.
AI Literacy ObligationAI Literacy Obligation: What Article 4 Requires Since 2026
AI DisclosureAI Chatbot Disclosure: Article 50 in Practice
AI Text WatermarkAI Text Watermark: What Claude Marks and What It Doesn't
Local AILocal AI for Business: What “Local” Really Means
AI for SMEsAI for SMEs: How to Introduce AI Step by Step
Where the information on this page comes from
- AI Act, Art. 12 Record-keepingretrieved 26 Sep 2026
- AI Act, Art. 19 Automatically generated logsretrieved 26 Sep 2026
- AI Act, Art. 26 Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systemsretrieved 26 Sep 2026
- AI Act, Art. 50 Transparency obligationsretrieved 26 Sep 2026
- AI Act, Art. 113 Entry into force and applicationretrieved 26 Sep 2026
- Bundesnetzagentur (German AI supervisor): AI literacyretrieved 26 Sep 2026
- Defence:Connectretrieved 26 Sep 2026


